Skip to Main Content Skip to Footer

APPA Library

"A Method for Determination of Relative Priorities for Capital Improvement Projects"
Author: Rector, Philip G.
Published In: Remodeling, Renovation & Conversion of Educational Facilities
Date: 1975

Drawing from his experiences at California Institute of Technology, outlines the factors considered for ranking facilities projects: academic and nonacademic ranking, justification ranking, benefit--people/cost factor, benefit--people/time factor, and project type ranking factor (building rehabilitation, utilities, and site improvements and landscaping). Reprints CIT's Capital Improvement Program Project Ranking Guide and worksheet for determining project point value.

Share this page. You can e-mail this description and a link to this page to any valid e-mail address.

Send this page to this email address:
(You can enter more than one email address separated by commas.)
Add your own message:
Your Name:

Return to Search Page