"A Method for Determination of Relative Priorities for Capital Improvement Projects"
Author: Rector, Philip G.
Published In: Remodeling, Renovation & Conversion of Educational Facilities
Date: 1975
Drawing from his experiences at California Institute of Technology, outlines the factors considered for ranking facilities projects: academic and nonacademic ranking, justification ranking, benefit--people/cost factor, benefit--people/time factor, and project type ranking factor (building rehabilitation, utilities, and site improvements and landscaping). Reprints CIT's Capital Improvement Program Project Ranking Guide and worksheet for determining project point value.
Share this page. You can e-mail this description and a link to this page to any valid e-mail address.